The reclaim may be too much, maybe hide it behind a feature flag or just remove it for now, the `unspent` should be enough. #1255

New issue

Closed

opened 2025-11-05 15:23:35 +00:00 by crodas · 1 comment

crodas commented

2025-11-05 15:23:35 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

The reclaim may be too much, maybe hide it behind a feature flag or just remove it for now, the unspent should be enough.

Originally posted by @crodas in https://github.com/cashubtc/cdk/pull/1250#discussion_r2495044351

The reclaim may be too much, maybe hide it behind a feature flag or just remove it for now, the `unspent` should be enough. _Originally posted by @crodas in https://github.com/cashubtc/cdk/pull/1250#discussion_r2495044351_

thesimplekid commented

2025-11-06 01:38:38 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Lets not do a feature flag for this and just remove it. I don't think it justifies the complexity.

👍 1 ❤️ 1

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

cashubtc/cdk#1255

No description provided.

Rows
Columns

The reclaim may be too much, maybe hide it behind a feature flag or just remove it for now, the unspent should be enough. #1255

The reclaim may be too much, maybe hide it behind a feature flag or just remove it for now, the `unspent` should be enough. #1255